Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Susceptibility

In Vitro Activity of S-3578, a New Broad-Spectrum Cephalosporin Active against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococci

Takaji Fujimura, Yoshinori Yamano, Isamu Yoshida, Jingoro Shimada, Shogo Kuwahara
Takaji Fujimura
1Discovery Research Laboratories, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., Toyonaka, Osaka 561-0825
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: takaji.fujimura@shionogi.co.jp
Yoshinori Yamano
1Discovery Research Laboratories, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., Toyonaka, Osaka 561-0825
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Isamu Yoshida
1Discovery Research Laboratories, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., Toyonaka, Osaka 561-0825
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jingoro Shimada
2St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Kanagawa 216-8511
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shogo Kuwahara
3Department of Microbiology, Toho University School of Medicine, Ota-ku, Tokyo 143-8540, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.47.3.923-931.2003
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The in vitro antibacterial activity of S-3578, a new parenteral cephalosporin, against clinical isolates was evaluated. The MICs of the drug at which 90% of the isolates were inhibited were 4 Ојg/ml for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and 2 Ојg/ml for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis, which were fourfold higher than and equal to those of vancomycin, respectively. The anti-MRSA activity of S-3578 was considered to be due to its high affinity for penicillin-binding protein 2a (50% inhibitory concentration, 4.5 Ојg/ml). In time-kill studies with 10 strains each of MRSA and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus, S-3578 caused more than a 4-log10 decrease of viable cells on the average at twice the MIC after 24 h of exposure, indicating that it had potent bactericidal activity. Furthermore, in population analysis of MRSA strains with heterogeneous or homogeneous resistance to imipenem, no colonies emerged from about 109 cells on agar plates containing twice the MIC of S-3578, suggesting the low frequency of emergence of S-3578-resistant strains from MRSA. S-3578 was also highly active against penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae (PRSP), with a MIC90 of 1 Ојg/ml, which was comparable to that of ceftriaxone. S-3578 also had antibacterial activity against a variety of gram-negative bacteria including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, though its activity was not superior to that of cefepime. In conclusion, S-3578 exhibited a broad antibacterial spectrum and, particularly, had excellent activity against gram-positive bacteria including methicillin-resistant staphylococci and PRSP. Thus, S-3578 was considered to be worthy of further evaluation.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (MRCNS) cause serious problems in nosocomial infection. The major factor in the mechanism of resistance to β-lactams in MRSA and MRCNS is known to be the production of a penicillin-binding protein peculiar to them, designated PBP2′ or PBP2a, which has low affinity for commercially available β-lactams (8). Furthermore, most clinical isolates of MRSA and MRCNS have acquired resistance to not only β-lactams but also various other antibiotics used in clinical settings. The worldwide spread and increased frequency of occurrence of these pathogens have caused difficulties in therapeutic treatment with antibiotics (5, 25).

Some antibiotics such as vancomycin, linezolid, or dalfopristin-quinupristin show clinical efficacy against infections caused by methicillin-resistant staphylococci (1, 6, 14) but have antibacterial activity against only gram-positive bacteria. Much effort has been spent on the development of ОІ-lactams with anti-MRSA activity in laboratories worldwide (10, 12, 24). Some compounds, for example, RWJ-54428 (MC-02479) or BMS-247243, have been reported elsewhere as anti-MRSA agents, but most of them also exhibit narrow-spectrum antibacterial activity (7, 13). On the other hand, broad-spectrum cephalosporins like ceftriaxone or cefepime have been useful against various infectious diseases but are not active against methicillin-resistant staphylococci. BAL9141 (formerly Ro-63-9141), which is under development, has been reported elsewhere to have satisfactory broad-spectrum activity with anti-MRSA activity (9). However, it does not have good water solubility and requires esterification to improve its solubility. With the aim of developing a broad-spectrum cephalosporin with anti-MRSA activity, we selected S-3578, 7ОІ-[2-(2-aminothiadiazol-4-yl)-2(Z)-ethoxyiminoacetamido]-3-(1-N-methylaminopropyl-1H-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridinium-4-yl)-methylcephalosporin, because of its antibacterial activities, aqueous solubility, and crystallinity (26).

In this study, we evaluated the in vitro antibacterial activity of S-3578, particularly focusing on its anti-MRSA activity.

(Part of this work was presented previously [Y. Yamano, H. Miwa, K. Motokawa, T. Yoshida, J. Shimada, and S. Kuwahara, Abstr. 41st Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. F-371, 2001; T. Fujimura, Y. Yamano, I. Yoshida, T. Yoshida, J. Shimada, and S. Kuwahara, Abstr. 41st Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. F-372, 2001].)

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Antibiotics.S-3578 was synthesized in the research laboratories of Shionogi & Co., Ltd. (Osaka, Japan). Its chemical structure is shown in Fig. 1. Other compounds were purchased from commercial sources.

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

Chemical structure of S-3578, 7ОІ-[2-(2-aminothiadiazol-4-yl)-2(Z)-ethoxyiminoacetamido]-3-(1-N-methylaminopropyl-1H-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridinium-4-yl)-methylcephalosporin.

Organisms.Bacterial strains used in this study were clinical isolates collected from hospitals in various parts of Japan in 2000 and 2001 and strains from our laboratory collection. S. aureus SRM710, deficient in PBP2, was used in a binding affinity assay of PBP2a of MRSA (18).

MIC determination.MICs for aerobic bacteria were determined by a microdilution broth method as recommended by the NCCLS (20) with cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (CA-MHB) (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, Md.), which was supplemented with 15 Ојg of NAD/ml, 5% yeast extract (Becton Dickinson), and 5% lysed horse blood to support the growth of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae. CA-MHB with 2% NaCl was used to determine MICs of oxacillin for staphylococci. MICs for Neisseria gonorrhoeae were determined by an agar dilution method with GC medium (Becton Dickinson) containing growth supplement after incubation at 35В°C for 20 h in the presence of 6% CO2. MICs for anaerobic bacteria were determined by an agar dilution method with Wilkins-Chalgren medium (Becton Dickinson) after anaerobic incubation at 35В°C for 48 h.

Determination of minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC).MBCs were determined by a macrodilution method with CA-MHB according to the NCCLS recommendations (19).

Time-kill study.The culture of a test strain at the early or mid-log phase was diluted to about 5 Г— 105 CFU/ml in 5 ml of fresh CA-MHB. Antibiotics at various concentrations were added to the diluted cultures. Viable cells were counted after shaking at 37В°C for 0, 1, 2.5, 4, and 6 h. In the studies of S. aureus, the additional counting was performed at 24 h.

PBP binding affinity.The affinities of antibiotics for PBPs were determined by a competition assay with [14C]benzylpenicillin (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, England) as described previously (17, 23). The binding affinity of each compound was expressed as the concentration required to inhibit 50% of the binding of [14C]benzylpenicillin to each PBP (IC50).

Population analysis and frequency of emergence of resistant colonies.An overnight culture of S. aureus in CA-MHB was diluted with fresh medium to the appropriate bacterial density and spread onto a Mueller-Hinton agar plate containing serial twofold dilutions of antibiotics. The plates were incubated for 3 days at 37В°C, and the number of colonies was counted. The frequency of emergence of resistant colonies on an agar plate containing S-3578 was shown as their ratio to the number of colonies grown on an agar plate without antibiotics.

ОІ-Lactamase stability.ОІ-Lactamases were purified partially from bacterial membrane by ion-exchange chromatography as described previously (16). The stability of antibiotics against hydrolysis by ОІ-lactamases was assessed by determining the hydrolysis rate by a spectrophotometric assay method (21). The kinetics parameters Km and Vmax were calculated from at least two independent experiments with the Michaelis-Menten formulation.

RESULTS

MIC determination.The antibacterial activity of S-3578 was compared with those of cefepime, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, and imipenem. For gram-positive bacteria, vancomycin was also used as a comparator, as were oxacillin for staphylococci and penicillin G for S. pneumoniae. The results are shown in Table 1 as the MIC range, MIC50 (the concentration at which the growth of 50% of the isolates was inhibited), and MIC90.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

In vitro antibacterial activities of S-3578 and reference compounds against clinical isolates

S-3578 showed consistent antibacterial activity against staphylococci including methicillin-resistant strains and inhibited the growth of all clinical isolates of staphylococci at 8 Ојg/ml. The MIC90s of S-3578 for MRSA and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE) were 4 and 2 Ојg/ml, respectively, whereas those of other ОІ-lactam compounds were 64 Ојg/ml or more. S-3578 was fourfold less active against MRSA than was vancomycin, but its activity against MRSE was equal to that of vancomycin. For methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and methicillin-susceptible S. epidermidis, the MIC90s of S-3578 were 2 and 0.5 Ојg/ml, respectively. It was characteristic that the MICs of S-3578 for methicillin-resistant staphylococcus strains were only two- to fourfold higher than those for methicillin-susceptible staphylococcus strains.

S-3578 had activities against penicillin-susceptible, -intermediate, and -resistant S. pneumoniae, with MIC90s of 0.25, 1, and 1 Ојg/ml, respectively, which were comparable to those of ceftriaxone and cefepime. However, S-3578 was not as active against Enterococcus faecalis as were other cephalosporins, though it showed the lowest MIC50 among the cephalosporins tested.

S-3578 was also active against a variety of gram-negative bacteria, although its activity was not superior to those of cefepime and imipenem, except that imipenem was less active than was S-3578 against H. influenzae. The MIC90s of S-3578 for Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Klebsiella oxytoca were 1 Ојg/ml or less, which was comparable to those of ceftazidime but two- to eightfold higher than those of cefepime, ceftriaxone, and imipenem. Some S-3578-resistant strains of these species were also resistant to other cephalosporins. The MIC90s of S-3578 for Enterobacter aerogenes, Citrobacter freundii, Serratia marcescens, Proteus mirabilis, and Providencia rettgeri ranged from 2 to 8 Ојg/ml, and most strains of Proteus vulgaris were not susceptible to S-3578. S-3578 was active against H. influenzae except for ОІ-lactamase-negative ampicillin-resistant strains with a MIC90 of 0.25 Ојg/ml, regardless of the ОІ-lactamase production. Its activity was comparable to those of cefepime and ceftazidime but lower than that of ceftriaxone. The activity of S-3578 against Moraxella catarrhalis (MIC90, 1 Ојg/ml) was higher than those of ceftriaxone and cefepime but fourfold lower than that of ceftazidime. S-3578 showed activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa with a MIC50 and a MIC90 of 8 and 64 Ојg/ml, respectively, which were two- to fourfold higher than those of ceftazidime and cefepime. The activity of S-3578 against Acinetobacter baumannii was the highest among the cephalosporins tested, though its MIC50 and MIC90 were 1 and 16 Ојg/ml, respectively. S-3578, however, had the same potential against N. gonorrhoeae as did penicillin G, though other compounds were more active.

The antibacterial activities against anaerobic pathogens were determined. S-3578 inhibited growth of all strains of Peptostreptococcus spp. at 8 Ојg/ml, which meant that it was as active as ceftriaxone was. Bacteroides fragilis was not susceptible to S-3578.

Bactericidal activity.We first determined MBCs for 20 clinical isolates each of MRSA and MSSA including ОІ-lactamase producers. The MBC/MIC ratios for S-3578 against all strains were 1 or 2 (Fig. 2). In particular, the number of MSSA strains showing the ratio of 1 for S-3578 was larger than the number of those showing the same ratio for cefepime and ceftriaxone, suggesting that S-3578 was more bactericidal than the reference agents were. The production of ОІ-lactamase did not have any influence on both MBCs and MICs of S-3578 as well as of the reference compounds.

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

Distribution of MBCs and MICs for 20 clinical isolates each of MRSA (A) or MSSA (B). The activity of S-3578 was compared with those of cefepime and ceftriaxone against MSSA. Open and closed circles indicate ОІ-lactamase-producing and nonproducing strains, respectively.

Next, we constructed the killing kinetics curves for MRSA and MSSA strains. S-3578 caused a time-dependent decrease of viable cells of the MSSA strain Smith at one or more times the MIC until 6 h, as did cefepime and ceftriaxone (Fig. 3B). Furthermore, the number of viable cells after 24-h exposure to S-3578 was significantly lower than the number after exposure to the reference compounds. S-3578 also showed similar bactericidal activity against the MRSA strain SR3637 at two or more times the MIC (Fig. 3A). Moreover, the decreases of viable cells with 10 clinical isolates each of MRSA or MSSA were compared after 24-h exposure to twice the MIC of each antibiotic. S-3578 caused more than a 4-log10-CFU/ml reduction on the average for both MRSA and MSSA, while cefepime and ceftriaxone demonstrated only less than a 2-log10-CFU/ml reduction for MSSA (Fig. 4). These results indicated that the bactericidal activity of S-3578 was more potent than those of cefepime and ceftriaxone against S. aureus, irrespective of methicillin resistance.

FIG. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 3.

Killing kinetics curves for S-3578 and reference compounds against S. aureus SR3637 (MRSA) (A) and Smith (MSSA) (B).

FIG. 4.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 4.

Decrease of viable cells in 10 clinical isolates each of MRSA or MSSA after 24-h exposure to twice the MIC of S-3578. Cefepime and ceftriaxone were used as comparators for MSSA. An open circle indicates decrease of viable cell counts of each strain compared to the initial inoculum, and a bar indicates the average of those of 10 strains.

The MBCs of S-3578 for 20 clinical isolates of E. coli for which MICs were 0.13 to 1 Ојg/ml ranged from 0.25 to 1 Ојg/ml, while the MBCs and MICs of cefepime ranged from 0.25 to 2 Ојg/ml and from 0.13 to 2 Ојg/ml, respectively (Fig. 5). All strains tested were ОІ-lactamase producers, indicating that the activity of S-3578 was not affected by ОІ-lactamase. Furthermore, the killing kinetics curves for E. coli NIHJ JC-2 and P. aeruginosa SR24706 indicated that S-3578 also had time-dependent bactericidal activity against these species which was comparable to those of the reference compounds (Fig. 6).

FIG. 5.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 5.

Distribution of MBCs and MICs for 20 clinical isolates of E. coli. The activity of S-3578 was compared with that of cefepime. All strains produced ОІ-lactamases.

FIG. 6.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 6.

Killing kinetics curves for S-3578 and reference compounds against E. coli NIHJ JC-2 (A) and P. aeruginosa SR24706 (B).

Binding affinity for PBPs.S-3578 was found to have high affinity for PBP2a of MRSA, with an IC50 of 4.5 Ојg/ml (Table 2). This characteristic seemed to reflect the anti-MRSA activity of S-3578. In contrast, cefepime, which was not active against MRSA, had a very low affinity for PBP2a. S-3578 also showed high affinities for PBP1 and -2 of S. aureus with IC50s of less than 0.5 Ојg/ml, as did ceftriaxone and cefepime.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

Binding affinity for PBPs of S. aureus

Cefepime had high affinities for PBP2 and -3 of E. coli with IC50s of less than 1 Ојg/ml, and ceftriaxone had affinities for PBP1A, -1B, -2, and -3 (Table 3). On the other hand, S-3578 had high affinity only for PBP3. Although the IC50s of S-3578 for PBP1A, -3, and -4 of P. aeruginosa ranged from 0.31 to 0.43 Ојg/ml (Table 4), its binding affinity was not as high as those of cefepime and ceftazidime, the IC50s of which for PBP3 were 10-fold less than that of S-3578.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3.

Binding affinity for PBPs of E. coli

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 4.

Binding affinity for PBPs of P. aeruginosa

Frequency of emergence of resistant colonies.In order to estimate the frequency of resistance development, we first carried out population analysis on two clinical isolates of MRSA, the low-level-methicillin-resistant strain SR19754 and the high-level-methicillin-resistant strain SR19760. As shown in Fig. 7, strain SR19754 had a subpopulation resistant to imipenem at a frequency of about 10в€’6 in spite of the low MIC of imipenem for this strain, that is, it exhibited a heteroresistance profile. In contrast, the viabilities of both strains against S-3578 sharply decreased with increase of the antibiotic concentration. In particular, it was notable that no colonies emerged on agar plates containing twice the MIC of S-3578. Furthermore, about 109 bacterial cells each of 20 clinical isolates of MRSA were spread on agar plates containing S-3578 and incubated for 3 days at 35В°C. For all isolates, no colonies appeared on the plates at twice the MIC, and emergence from an isolate for which the MIC was 8 Ојg/ml did not occur even at the MIC (data not shown). From these results, the frequency at which resistant colonies emerged was estimated to be below 10в€’9.

FIG. 7.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 7.

Population analysis profiles of two clinical isolates of MRSA. Strains SR19754 (A) and SR19760 (B) are low-level- and high-level-methicillin-resistant strains, respectively. The MICs of S-3578 and imipenem for each strain are indicated in the figure. Closed circles and open triangles indicate viable cell counts on plates containing S-3578 or imipenem, respectively.

ОІ-Lactamase stability.The hydrolysis of S-3578 and cefepime by a ОІ-lactamase purified from S. aureus SR5644 was not detected at 100 Ојg of the compounds per ml (data not shown), indicating that S-3578 was stable against hydrolysis by the ОІ-lactamase from S. aureus. S-3578, as well as cefepime, was stable against TEM-1 and a class A ОІ-lactamase from K. pneumoniae GN69 (22) because their hydrolysis rates were less than 0.1% of that of ampicillin at the substrate concentration of 100 Ојg/ml (data not shown). Although the Km values of S-3578 against various AmpC enzymes from C. freundii, Enterobacter cloacae, and P. aeruginosa were lower than those of cefepime, its relative Vmax/Km values were comparable to those of cefepime. These results indicated that S-3578 had higher affinity for AmpC enzymes but was as stable as cefepime was against hydrolysis (Table 5). On the other hand, S-3578 was not as stable as cefepime was against a Toho-1-like extended-spectrum ОІ-lactamase and a class B IMP-1-like enzyme (data not shown).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 5.

Stability of S-3578 against AmpC ОІ-lactamases

DISCUSSION

One of the most striking features of S-3578 was its activity against methicillin-resistant staphylococci. S-3578 inhibited growth of all clinical isolates of Staphylococcus spp. including methicillin-resistant strains at 8 Ојg/ml, although other ОІ-lactam compounds including imipenem were not active against most strains of methicillin-resistant staphylococci. We further characterized the anti-MRSA activity of S-3578 as follows. First, this activity of S-3578, like those of other anti-MRSA ОІ-lactams (3, 9, 15), was considered to be due to the high affinity for PBP2a. This was consistent with reports of a correlation between the affinity for PBP2a and the MIC for MRSA strains with a high level of resistance to ОІ-lactams (2, 11). Second, S-3578 showed potent bactericidal activity against MSSA and MRSA strains. The superiority of S-3578 over cefepime and ceftriaxone in bactericidal activity against MSSA was represented by a significant decrease of viable cells after 24-h exposure to S-3578. The results in Fig. 3 and 4 indicate that S-3578 had potent bactericidal activity against not only MSSA but also MRSA. Third, the frequency of emergence of resistant colonies from MRSA strains was extremely low. Moreover, S-3578 showed remarkable reduction of the viability of the heteroresistant strain in contrast with imipenem, which easily selected its resistant subpopulation (Fig. 7). These results suggested that S-3578-resistant strains would rarely emerge during antibiotic treatment. The two latter features would contribute to in vivo therapeutic efficacy against MRSA infection.

In addition to the activity against methicillin-resistant staphylococci, S-3578 was highly active against streptococci including penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae, though most E. faecalis strains were not susceptible to this compound. On the other hand, S-3578 was not as active against gram-negative bacteria as cefepime was, but it showed antibacterial activity comparable to that of ceftazidime against most members of the family Enterobacteriaceae, H. influenzae, and M. catarrhalis. The antipseudomonal activity of S-3578, with a MIC50 of 8 Ојg/ml, was two- to fourfold less than those of ceftazidime and cefepime.

In conclusion, S-3578 is a novel parenteral broad-spectrum cephalosporin antibiotic with high activity against methicillin-resistant staphylococci. It should be noted that S-3578 is soluble in water at more than 100 mg/ml (26). This water solubility is a great advantage because most anti-MRSA cephalosporins have been reported elsewhere to be insoluble in water (4, 9). The pharmacokinetic profile of S-3578 in mice is similar to that of cefepime, and S-3578 shows good therapeutic efficacy in murine models of infection by MRSA, penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae, or P. aeruginosa (M. Tsuji, M. Takema, H. Miwa, J. Shimada, and S. Kuwahara, submitted for publication). Thus, S-3578 is considered to be a promising compound for further evaluation as an anti-MRSA broad-spectrum cephalosporin antibiotic.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to M. Doi, Y. Jinushi, Y. Kimura, H. Motoyama, K. Motokawa, T. Munekage, and K. Uotani for their superb technical assistance.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 5 July 2002.
    • Returned for modification 1 October 2002.
    • Accepted 10 December 2002.
  • Copyright В© 2003 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Antony, S. J., E. Diaz-Vasquez, and C. Stratton. 2001. Clinical experience with linezolid in the treatment of resistant gram-positive infections. J. Natl. Med. Assoc.93:386-391.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    Chambers, H. F., and M. Sachdeva. 1990. Binding of ОІ-lactam antibiotics to penicillin-binding proteins in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Infect. Dis.161:1170-1176.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    Chambers, H. F. 1995. In vitro and in vivo antistaphylococcal activities of L-695,256, a carbapenem with high affinity for the penicillin-binding protein PBP 2a. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.39:462-466.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    Cho, A., T. W. Glinka, M. Ludwikow, A. T. Fan, M. Wang, and S. J. Hecker. 2001. New anti-MRSA cephalosporins with a basic aminopyridine at the C-7 position. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.11:137-140.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    Diekema, D. J., M. A. Pfaller, J. Turnidge, J. Verhoef, J. Bell, A. C. Fluit, G. V. Doern, R. N. Jones, and the SENTRY Participants Group. 2000. Genetic relatedness of multidrug-resistant, methicillin (oxacillin)-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream isolates from SENTRY antimicrobial resistance surveillance centers worldwide, 1998. Microb. Drug Resist.6:213-221.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    Drew, R. H., J. R. Perfect, L. Srinath, E. Kurkimilis, M. Dowzicky, and G. H. Talbot. 2000. Treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections with quinupristin-dalfopristin in patients intolerant of or failing prior therapy. J. Antimicrob. Chem.46:775-784.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    Fung-Tomc, J. C., J. Clark, B. Minassian, M. Pucci, Y. Tsai, E. Gradelski, L. Lamb, I. Media, E. Huczko, B. Kolek, S. Chaniewski, C. Ferraro, T. Washo, and D. P. Bonner. 2002. In vitro and in vivo activities of a novel cephalosporin, BMS-247243, against methicillin-resistant and susceptible staphylococci. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.46:971-976.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    Hartman, B. J., and A. Tomasz. 1984. Low-affinity penicillin-binding protein associated with ОІ-lactam resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol.158:513-516.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    Hebeisen, P., I. Heinze-Krauss, P. Angehrn, P. Hohl, M. G. P. Page, and R. L. Then. 2001. In vitro and in vivo properties of Ro63-9141, a novel broad-spectrum cephalosporin with activity against methicillin-resistant staphylococci. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.45:825-836.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    Heinze-Krauss, I., P. Angehrn, P. Guerry, P. Hebeisen, C. Hubschwerlen, I. Kompis, M. G. P. Page, H. G. F. Richter, V. Runtz, H. Stalder, U. Weiss, and C. Wei. 1996. Synthesis and structure-activity relationship of (lactamylvinyl)cephalosporins exhibiting activity against staphylococci, pneumococci, and enterococci. J. Med. Chem.39:1864-1871.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    Higashi, Y., A. Wakabayashi, Y. Matsumoto, Y. Watanabe, and A. Ohno. 1999. Role of inhibition of penicillin binding proteins and cell wall cross-linking by beta-lactam antibiotics in low- and high-level methicillin resistance of Staphylococcus aureus. Chemotherapy45:37-47.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    Ishikawa, T., K. Kamiyama, Y. Nakayama, Y. Iizawa, K. Okonogi, and A. Miyake. 2001. Studies on anti-MRSA parenteral cephalosporins. III. Synthesis and antibacterial activity of 7ОІ-[2-(5-amino-1,2,4-thiadiazol-3-yl)-2(Z)-alkoxyiminoacetamido]-3-[(E)-2-(1-alkylimidazo[1,2-b]pyridazinium-6-yl)thiovinyl]-3-cephem-4-carboxylates and related compounds. J. Antibiot.54:257-277.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    Johnson, A. P., M. Warner, M. Carter, and D. M. Livermore. 2002. In vitro activity of cephalosporin RWJ-54428 (MC-02479) against multidrug-resistant gram-positive cocci. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.46:321-326.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    Lowy, F. 1998. Staphylococcus aureus infections. N. Engl. J. Med.339:520-532.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    Matsumoto, M., H. Tamaoka, H. Ishikawa, and M. Kikuchi. 1998. In vitro and in vivo antibacterial activities of OPC-20011, a novel parenteral broad-spectrum 2-oxaisocephem antibiotic. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.42:2943-2949.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    Murakami, K., and T. Yoshida. 1985. Covalent binding of moxalactam to cephalosporinase of Citrobacter freundii. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.27:727-732.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    Murakami, K., K. Nomura, M. Doi, and T. Yoshida. 1987. Production of low-affinity penicillin-binding protein by low-and high-resistance groups of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.31:1307-1311.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    Murakami, K., K. Nomura, M. Doi, and T. Yoshida. 1987. Increased susceptibility to cephamycin-type antibiotics of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus defective in penicillin-binding protein 2. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.31:1423-1425.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 1999. Methods for determining bactericidal activity of antimicrobial agents; approved guideline. M26-A. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
  20. 20.↵
    National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2000. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically, approved standard, 5th ed. M7-A5. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
  21. 21.↵
    O'Callaghan, C. H., P. W. Muggleton, and G. W. Ross. 1969. Effects of ОІ-lactamase from gram-negative organisms on cephalosporins and penicillins, p. 57-63. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1968.
  22. 22.↵
    Sawai, T., S. Yamagishi, and S. Mitsuhashi. 1973. Penicillinases of Klebsiella pneumoniae and their phylogenetic relationship to penicillinases mediated by R factors. J. Bacteriol.115:1045-1054.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    Spratt, B. G. 1977. Properties of the penicillin-binding proteins of Escherichia coli K12. Eur. J. Biochem.72:341-352.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    Springer, D. M., B. Luh, and J. J. Bronson. 2001. Anti-MRSA cephems. Part 1: C-3 substituted thiopyridinium derivatives. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.11:797-801.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    Witte, W. 1999. Antibiotic resistance in Gram-positive bacteria: epidemiological aspects. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.44:A1-A9.
    OpenUrl
  26. 26.↵
    Yoshizawa, H., H. Itani, K. Ishikura, T. Irie, K. Yokoo, T. Kubota, K. Minami, T. Iwaki, H. Miwa and Y. Nishitani. 2002. S-3578, a new broad spectrum parenteral cephalosporin exhibiting potent activity against both methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: synthesis and structure-activity relationships. J. Antibiot., 55:975-992.
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
In Vitro Activity of S-3578, a New Broad-Spectrum Cephalosporin Active against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococci
Takaji Fujimura, Yoshinori Yamano, Isamu Yoshida, Jingoro Shimada, Shogo Kuwahara
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Mar 2003, 47 (3) 923-931; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.47.3.923-931.2003

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
In Vitro Activity of S-3578, a New Broad-Spectrum Cephalosporin Active against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococci
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
In Vitro Activity of S-3578, a New Broad-Spectrum Cephalosporin Active against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococci
Takaji Fujimura, Yoshinori Yamano, Isamu Yoshida, Jingoro Shimada, Shogo Kuwahara
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Mar 2003, 47 (3) 923-931; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.47.3.923-931.2003
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Bacterial Proteins
cephalosporins
Hexosyltransferases
methicillin resistance
Peptidyl Transferases
Staphylococcus

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • AAC Podcast
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596