Page loading, please wait...
Antibiotics and antimicrobial therapy
ТАБЛЕТКО ANTIBIOTIC.ru
Hello, guest! :: Today: Wednesday, November 11, 2020 Russian page Russian 
 Main page :: IAC :: ISPR :: SCMAR :: IACMAC :: CMAC
Site navigation

WHO

Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobial Chemotherapy - Official IACMAC Journal

Safety and Side Effects of Rifampin versus Isoniazid in Children

Published: Thursday, November 08, 2018 - 09:30
Topic: Site News Printer friendly page

Background

The treatment of latent infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis is important in children because of their vulnerability to life-threatening forms of tuberculosis disease. The current standard treatment — 9 months of isoniazid — has been associated with poor adherence and toxic effects, which have hampered the effectiveness of the drug. In adults, treatment with 4 months of rifampin has been shown to be safer and to have higher completion rates than 9 months of isoniazid.

Methods

In this multicenter, open-label trial, we randomly assigned 844 children (<18 years of age) with latent M. tuberculosis infection to receive either 4 months of rifampin or 9 months of isoniazid. The primary outcome was adverse events of grade 1 to 5 that resulted in the permanent discontinuation of a trial drug. Secondary outcomes were treatment adherence, side-effect profile, and efficacy. Independent review panels whose members were unaware of trial-group assignments adjudicated all adverse events and progression to active tuberculosis.

Results

Of the children who underwent randomization, 829 were eligible for inclusion in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. A total of 360 of 422 children (85.3%) in the rifampin group completed per-protocol therapy, as compared with 311 of 407 (76.4%) in the isoniazid group (adjusted difference in the rates of treatment completion, 13.4 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.5 to 19.3). There were no significant between-group differences in the rates of adverse events, with fewer than 5% of the children in the combined groups with grade 1 or 2 adverse events that were deemed to be possibly related to a trial drug. Active tuberculosis, including 1 case with resistance to isoniazid, was diagnosed in 2 children in the isoniazid group during 542 person-years of follow-up, as compared with no cases in the rifampin group during 562 person-years (rate difference, -0.37 cases per 100 person-years; 95% CI, -0.88 to 0.14).

Conclusions

Among children under the age of 18 years, treatment with 4 months of rifampin had similar rates of safety and efficacy but a better rate of adherence than 9 months of treatment with isoniazid. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00170209.)

Safety and Side Effects of Rifampin versus Isoniazid in Children

Diallo T, et al.

New Engl J Med. 2018;doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1714284


137

tuberculosis, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, rifampin, isoniazid, children

Safety and Side Effects of Rifampin versus Isoniazid in Children | Login/Create an account | 0 Comments
Threshold
Comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

Institute of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (IAC) Scientific Center of Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance The Interregional Association for Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Department of Clinical Pharmacology
© 2000-2020 IAC SSMA  antibiotic.ru@gmail.com